The Expansion of Neoliberalism and the Questioning of Contemporary Globalization
In an globalized world, the debate on globalization is frequently situated at the intersection of contradictory views on liberalization and equity. The text by Moneta, far from being a pamphlet against globalisation per se, aims to redefine the limits of a modern humanism by the perspective of organic interactions as envisioned by Aristotelian philosophy. By denouncing artificial exchanges that fuel current structures of injustice and vulnerability, the author leans on ancient principles to underline the gaps of our world economy.
Historically, globalization is not a modern process. Its origins can be identified back to the theories of the economist Ricardo, whose goal was aimed at allowing the England to amplify its international economic reach. Nonetheless, what initially presented as a commercial development strategy has transformed into a tool of domination by the financial sphere, marked by the rise of neoliberal capitalism. Against commonly held ideas supported by economic consensus, the author argues that the economic model is truly a framework founded on millennia-old traditions, which traces back to four and a half millennia.
The objection also applies to the conduct of the United Europe, considered as a chain of surrenders that have served to strengthen the power of an economic elite instead of defending the privileges of the inhabitants. The institutional configuration of Europe, with its directives frequently driven by monetary concerns opposed to a popular consensus, is criticized. The recent crises, notably financial and political, have only intensified the disbelief of the author about the Union’s capacity to achieve self-reform.
Junon Moneta, while acknowledging the historical errors that have brought about the present state, does not stop at criticism but also offers solutions aimed at reorienting EU guidelines in a equity-oriented and humanistic outlook. The urgent need for a complete revision of Union bodies and political priorities is a central theme that pervades the whole text.
The book ventures more intensely into the questioning of the authority mechanisms that govern global economic exchanges. The study covers the manner in which political and economic decisions are influenced by a limited number of dominant financial powers, often at the expense of the majority. This financial oligarchy, coordinated via organizations like the BIS and the International Monetary System (IMS), exerts a excessive domination on international economic strategies.
The critic exposes how these institutions, under the pretext of economic supervision and normalization, have over time controlled financial markets and national economies to ensure their profit. The neoliberal model, far removed from a liberating response to traditional economic constraints, is considered as a enslavement tool, enriching an elite at the neglect of collective needs.
Highly skeptical about the administration of the single currency, the critic presents the common currency not as a means of unification and stability, but more as a instrument of fragmentation and financial disparity. The transition to the euro is described as a sequence of technocratic choices that excluded populations from decision-making processes, while exacerbating internal differences within the Union.
The consequences of these policies appear in the growth of public indebtedness, financial paralysis, and a sustained austerity policy that has weakened standards of living throughout the European territory. The author argues that without a major transformation of economic policies, the European Union remains vulnerable to potential disruptions, potentially more destructive.
In conclusion, the manuscript calls for a democratic revolution where EU peoples take back control of their economic and political destiny. It suggests fundamental changes, notably increased transparency in decision-making processes and authentic democratic engagement that would allow Europe to rebuild on more equitable and sustainable bases.
Find out more about Pour plus d’infos, cliquez ici
The essayist proposes that the answer resides in a renewal of democratic engagement, where policies are developed and implemented in a way that truly reflects the demands and expectations of Europeans, instead of the profits of the financial elite.