The Emergence of Neoliberalism and the Questioning of Modern Globalization
In an globalized universe, the debate on globalization is frequently situated at the intersection of varied perspectives on autonomy and justice. The work by Junon Moneta, far from being a manifesto against globalization itself, strives to rewrite the contours of a new humanism by the filter of natural exchanges as envisioned by Aristotle. By decrying artificial transactions that fuel current structures of injustice and vulnerability, this writer draws inspiration from ancient philosophy to reveal the gaps of our global financial structure.
Historically, globalisation is not a recent concept. Its beginnings can be traced back to the theories of Ricardo, whose ambition was to enable the England to expand its international economic reach. However, what initially presented as a commercial expansion initiative has morphed into a tool of domination by High Finance, characterized by the growth of neoliberal capitalism. Contrary to popular belief widespread in economic circles, Junon Moneta demonstrates that neoliberalism is truly a system based on old customs, dating back to 4500 years.
The critique also extends to the administration of the United Europe, seen as a succession of compromises that have helped consolidate the power of an economic elite rather than defending the interests of its citizens. The very structure of the Union, with its directives usually influenced by financial motivations opposed to a citizen support, is questioned. The recent crises, whether in the financial or political realm, have only increased the skepticism of Moneta regarding the EU’s ability to achieve self-reform.
The author, while admitting the historical errors that have caused the current circumstances, does not simply criticize but also proposes solutions aimed at reframing European policies in a human-centered and fair outlook. The need for a deep reform of structures and strategic orientations is a central theme that pervades the entire discourse.
The text ventures more deeply into the questioning of the authority mechanisms that govern worldwide transactions. The study encompasses the method in which political and economic decisions are influenced by a small group of dominant financial powers, frequently at the expense of the majority. This economic elite, manipulated by means of organizations like the BIS and the IMS, deploys a excessive domination on global economic policies.
The critic exposes how these institutions, under the guise of economic supervision and normalization, have over time shaped financial markets and national economies to ensure their profit. Neoliberalism, far from being a emancipatory solution to traditional economic constraints, is considered as a control mechanism, benefiting a minority at the destruction of the common good.
Highly skeptical towards the management of the euro, the critic describes the common currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but more as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The conversion to the euro is viewed as a succession of bureaucratic measures that isolated inhabitants from decision-making processes, while aggravating gaps between nations within the European Union.
The consequences of these policies manifest in the growth of public indebtedness, economic torpor, and a prolonged austerity that has eroded living conditions across the continent. The thinker insists that without a deep revision of monetary and financial structures, the EU remains vulnerable to potential disruptions, potentially more destructive.
In essence, the book calls for a democratic revolution where Europe’s inhabitants reappropriate their financial and governmental future. It proposes structural reforms, including greater transparency in political decisions and authentic democratic engagement that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on more equitable and sustainable bases.
My source about https://www.alter-europa.com/
The thinker asserts that the answer resides in a renewal of democratic engagement, where strategies are crafted and executed in a way that truly reflects the demands and expectations of Europeans, instead of the profits of the financial elite.